La procédure judiciaire que mène Apple contre HTC pour violation de 20 brevets est une action judiciaire qui risque de créer un  bouleversement  dans  l’écosystème  des Ordi Phones.  Voici en anglais les 20 brevets qui posent problème (je ne vous fais pas la traduction au  risque de mettre des erreurs).

• The ‘331 Patent, entitled “Time-Based, Non-Constant Translation Of User Interface Objects Between States,” was duly and legally issued on April 22, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
• The ‘949 Patent, entitled “Touch Screen Device, Method, And Graphical User Interface For Determining Commands By Applying Heuristics,” was duly and legally issued on January 20, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘949 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
• The ‘849 Patent, entitled “Unlocking A Device By Performing Gestures On An Unlock Image,” was duly and legally issued on February 2, 2010 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘849 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
• The ‘381 Patent, entitled “List Scrolling And Document Translation, Scaling, And Rotation On A Touch-Screen Display,” was duly and legally issued on December 23, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘381 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
• The ‘726 Patent, entitled “System And Method For Managing Power Conditions Within A Digital Camera Device,” was duly and legally issued on July 6, 1999 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘726 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
• The ‘076 Patent, entitled “Automated Response To And Sensing Of User Activity In Portable Devices,” was duly and legally issued on December 15, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘076 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
• The ‘105 Patent, entitled “GMSK Signal Processors For Improved Communications Capacity And Quality,” was duly and legally issued on December 8, 1998 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘105 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit G.
• The ‘453 Patent, entitled “Conserving Power By Reducing Voltage Supplied To An Instruction-Processing Portion Of A Processor,” was duly and legally issued on June 3, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘453 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit H.
• The ‘599 Patent, entitled “Object-Oriented Graphic System,” was duly and legally issued on October 3, 1995 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘599 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit I.
• The ‘354 Patent, entitled “Object-Oriented Event Notification System With Listener Registration Of Both Interests And Methods,” was duly and legally issued on July 23, 2002 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘354 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit J.
• United States Patent No. 5,481,721 entitled “Method for Providing Automatic and Dynamic Translation of Object Oriented Programming Language-Based Message Passing Into Operation System Message Passing Using Proxy Objects,” issued on January 2, 1996…
• United States Patent No. 5,519,867 entitled “Object-Oriented Multitasking System,” issued on May 21, 1996…
• United States Patent No. 6,275,983 entitled “Object-Oriented Operating System,” issued on August 14, 2001…
• United States Patent No. 5,566,337 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Distributing Events in an Operating System,” issued on October 15, 1996…
• United States Patent No. 5,929,852 entitled “Encapsulated Network Entity Reference of a Network Component System,” issued on July 27, 1999…
• United States Patent No. 5,946,647 entitled “System and Method for Performing an Action on a Structure in Computer-Generated Data” issued on August 31, 1999…
• United States Patent No. 5,969,705 entitled “Message Protocol for Controlling a User Interface From an Inactive Application Program,” issued on October 19, 1999…
• United States Patent No. 6,343,263 entitled “Real-Time Signal Processing System for Serially Transmitted Data,” issued on January 29, 2002…
• United States Patent No. 5,915,131 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Handling I/O Requests Utilizing Separate Programming Interfaces to Access Separate I/O Service” issued on June 22, 1999…
• United States Patent No. RE39,486, entitled “Extensible, Replaceable Network Component System,” reissued on February 6, 2007…

Dans cette liste nous avons les intitulés des brevets d’Apple qui selon eux sont violés par HTC. Si on prend par exemple le brevet 381

The ‘381 Patent, entitled “List Scrolling And Document Translation, Scaling, And Rotation On A Touch-Screen Display,” was duly and legally issued on December 23, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘381 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

Traduction : le fonctionnement de la liste déroulante, du basculement en mode paysage suivant la position du téléphone et l’agrandissement des documents.

Toutes ces fonctionnalités HTC devrait les réaliser sans utiliser la technologie d’Apple. Il faudrait voir plus en détail le contenu de ces brevets, mail il me parait quand même difficile par exemple de mettre son téléphone en mode paysage sans tenir compte de la position de son terminal. Et la question qu’on peut se poser, est ce brevetable ce genre de logique d’utilisation?. Les Juges américains nous le diront.

Sources.

La très célèbre firme Apple vient de provoquer et de poursuivre en justice le très gros constructeur HTC.

Il semblerait que HTC aurait violé une vingtaine de brevets en corrélation avec l’interface utilisateur et le matériel utilisé sur l’iPhone et ses différents mobiles.

Nous ne connaissons pas (encore) les brevets qui ont été violés, mais nous pouvons supposer que l’implication de HTC avec Android n’a fait que pousser le conflit.

Dans ce monde technophile, il est difficile de ne pas violer un brevet ou du moins de s’en rapprocher sans en être une copie presque identique.

Apple serait donc sûr une stratégie de défensive, et semble vouloir faire perdre quelques dents à ses principaux concurrents.

apple.com via journaldugeek.com

Après avoir poursuivi Microsoft pour procédé abusif pour son navigateur Internet Explorer, la commission européenne à ouvert une enquête préliminaire contre Google suite à la plainte de trois sites Internet qui l’accusent d’abus de position dominante. Les sites français ejustice.fr, britannique Foundem et américain Ciao détenu par Microsoft sont les auteurs de la plainte.

Ces sites accusent Google de downranking, Google les plaçant dans des positions éloignées sur des recherches qui peuvent les concerner.

Pour le moment nous ne sommes que sur une enquête préliminaire et pour se défendre Google reconnait que son moteur de recherhe n’est pas parfait.

Contrairement à Microsoft où pour résoudre le problème c’était assez simple, il fallait juste que Microsoft propose d’autres navigateurs à l’installation de Windows,  pour Google si cette plainte aboutie je me demande ce qu’on demandera à Google de faire (Peut-être de diviser sa page en trois pour proposer d’autres moteurs de recherche lol).

Source.